Hitler Road, New Delhi - Change in address of Culture Minister of India

Today the charismatic leader, Narender Modi delivered another excellent speech in Madison Square. It was magnificent and he completely mesmerized the crowd both in US and the TV viewers in India equally. I will not go into those details.

One thing, which I caught hold of from his speech was this sentence "Slavery of 1000-1200" years. I am not trained as historian but I just wanted to mark that date

1192 - Prithviraj was defeated and that marked the long period of slavery of India till 1947

So, 1947 - 1192 = 755 Years

So, as per this dateline, India was under slavery only for 755


Did Modi got his numbers wrong or was this just a slip of tongue or a gross overestimation. I think it was none. What perhaps Modi was referring to was

1. Attack on India (old upto Sindu / Indus river) by Afghan / Turks
2. Attack from north on Samarkand

Well the dates are right to mark 1000 years of slavery, but perhaps the reference suits more to
1. Afghanistan
2. Pakistan

India (as currently defined) was slave only for 750 years. Nothing wrong in mentioning 1000-1200 with a broader view, but consider the fact that - Pakistan considers start of those years of slavery as years of liberation from rule of "Idol Worshipers"

So, Pakistan will consider these years as years of glory. But what about India, we still have an "Aurangzeb Road, Babar Road...... and so many other roads in the names of people, who committed mass murders going by each and every historical record" Perhaps this was done around 1940's when Indian elite was trying to convince Muslims to stay with India. ............But do we still need to keep these road names same and remove the names of those mass murderers and looters.

Some might agree they were rulers and aristocrat...blah blah.......then lets have a road by name of

1. Yakubu, for their achievements in Nigeria
2. Jamat-e-Eslami , Indian Govt. can request Bangladesh for special release for ingratiation 
3. Turkey for their achievements in Greece, Antolia and Kurdistan
4. Hitler, we all know
5. Mugabe, still alive, can come to inauguration of road
6. Khmer Rouge, some still alive

This will show India is recognize the roads by not only the suppressors and murderers on national level but on international level.

Where are the muslim girls ?

There has been 2 diktats much in news regarding Garbha

1. BJP MLA in MP stating that entry by only ID
2. Some association that Garbha only for Hindus

Now consider 2 contrasting issues

1. Going by all the demographic nos. as discussed by me in  UCC and Ticking Time Bomb, it is quite clear that Muslims have better sex ratio than Hindus
2. But still if you see the inter-religion marriage, in 99% of cases (as per survey and media reports) are cases of Muslim Boy - Hindu Girl. 

The above mentioned facts does not seem to reconcile with each other. The main issue, we are missing here are
1. Sex ration is for overall population
2. Marriages are mostly in the age group of 20-35.
3. Within this age group the sex-ratio of Hindus and Muslims are not very different form each other

So, it reconciles the above mentioned anomaly, but now it raises one more important question. If the sex ratio are same, then

1. Why only Muslim men marry Hindu girl and not the reverse Muslim girl marry Hindu men ?
2. Why only Muslim men are in Garba not muslim women

Well some might explain it as "Love Jihad", but I will not go in politics. I think the "Love Jihad" may be a reason, but there are other reasons also

1. Islam (as far as I know) is like a cult and hence it is like a one way jail, you can enter on your will but can not exit as it is treated as treacherous 
2. Islam welcomes someone coming to Islam (like a girl marrying)
3. Islam consider marrying of Muslim girl to non-muslim as crime

If some proponents of these "Love Jihad" and other "Conspiracy theories" see in detail, there are some fundamental reasons and most of the so-branded "Love Jihad" may not be intentional. (though I  personally have no stand on this issue and see it purely from factual point of view)

Again, I will refrain myself from political angle to this sensitive issue, but it point out to a very pertinent question - "Where are those Muslim Girls?"

Unfortunately, I am not able to find any data on the percentage of girls based on religion in higher education. So, I am still exploring answers to this question.

Urgent Need of UCC (Uniform Civil Code) to prevent future tensions - “Ticking Demographic Bomb”

Urgent Need of UCC (Uniform Civil Code) to prevent future tensions - “Ticking Demographic Bomb”

(There are many gross overestimation done to make ease in analysis, but still trends will be similar)

Not going into the details and issues around "Love Jihad", I did some detailed analysis of the gender ratio's of Hindus, Muslims, Christians, Sikhs etc in India and came to following conclusions

1.        Muslims constitute around 15% of population officially (18% unofficially due to Bangladeshis and other illegal and ignored)

2.        Their (950) sex ratios are better than Hindus (931)

3.        All 5 major non-muslim communities such as Hindus, Christians, Sikhs, Buddhists and Jains have lower percentage of percentage of population in 0-6 years age than national average

4.        Jains just have 10% in 0-6 age, while Hindus have 15% in 0-6 years

5.        Child sex ratio is all time low at 914 in 2011

6.        Christian (2.3%) is the only group with more men than women

7.        In addition to this Muslims (3.4) have a higher TFR (Total Fertility Rates) than all major communities such as Hindus (2), Christians (2.1), Sikhs, Buddhists and Jains (1.4), who interestingly have lower percentage of percentage of population in 0-6 years age than national average

8.         India is 18% of world population, with population growth rate of 1.41% ranking 102 in world. India is primarily young with 65% below 35 years. 50% is below 25 years. That mean this 50% is in the age around marriage

9.         The worst male/female ratio are in the age group 0-10 years (1.14)

10.     The second worst and of immediate concern is 15–24 years: 1.09 male(s)/female

11.     Previous generation was in comfortable range with 65 years and over: 0.908 male(s)/female and current generation is also not very bad

The above data clearly indicate a demographic socio-economic Reverse “Love Jihad” is bound to happen. Let us analyze what happened in Haryana

1.         What people in Haryana did when they found they don’t have brides, they went outside from UP / Himachal

2.         They did not went to Rajasthan at it was equally pathetic

Now let us imagine that Hindus, Muslims, Christians are tiny states like Haryana, UP, Himanchal. Let do some scenario analysis

Current Scenario

With m/f ratio close to 1.0, no major threat

Short Term Scenario (5-10 years)

15-25 reaches age of marriage, but we have 9% more men than women, means 9% men will not get bride. This is same as Haryana situation.

Solution - > Bride import will begin to start

Initially Muslims will be difficult to convince to marry to Hindus, so may be Christians will be the first exporter of brides to Hindus/Jains /Sikhs etc

Medium Term Scenario (10-15 years)

Now lets imagine this 0-10 years group with male to female ratio of 1.14 reaches the age of 20 after 20 years

Scenario 1 :- (Reverse Love Jihad) Indian muslims accepts export of brides to Hindus as Hindus lack them. Struggle for brides will intensify. If Muslims accepts UCC (Uniform Civil Code), there are high chances they will mingle themselves with mainstream.

Scenario 2:- Some ISIS like organization get upstart in India and ask Muslim to reject UCC and harden Muslim Extremism. Indian Muslims deny export of brides to Hindus. Hindus still need them then it is a dangerous situation which will either lead to forced conversion of either Hindus to Muslims to marry or will lead clashes.

Hence, UCC is immediate need of the hour to help bridge the divide between Hindus and Muslims so that there can be easy exchange of brides. Similar to case of Haryana, Bride exchange between territories (read here religion) is bound to happen. Else this is “Ticking Demographic Bomb”

Also, this also breaks apart a myth that Islam is anti-woman, yes it is indeed if you look the pity situation of women in Islam, but perhaps Hindus are more anti-women. This is because, even though Hindus have higher respect and stature of women in society than Islam, but the higher class hindus are simply preventing women birth in the first place.